English for the many or the few

The hatred of Conservative education ministers for democratic ideas about language  connects with their broader opposition to comprehensive education. There is nothing very new in their elitist attitudes to English teaching or indeed to comprehensive education.

Many of their ideas derive from a series of pamphlets known as the Black Papers (1969) – a frontal attack on progressive education. The writers suggested that child-centred teachers were too concerned with ideas of personal growth to bother about ‘standards’.

Victorianclassroom600x300These Conservative thinkers argued that English should be about teaching a fixed body of knowledge: re-establishing the pre-eminence of the English Literary Heritage, and the explicit teaching of grammar and Standard English. They argued that ‘standards’ would only be maintained if they were clearly and publicly defined, hence the need for tests and league tables.

This chapter by Valerie Coultas (Kingston University), English for the few or for the many, explains their fixation with phonics, grammar, Standard English and assessing writing by exams, as well as their nationalistic stance on the English literary heritage. She points out some of the myths in the nostalgia-laden Conservative argument, along with their deficit view of working-class culture and language, and argues for a more democratic basis for English teaching.

This entry was posted in Curriculum, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s